John Little closed, followed by Robinsons and now Metro.
The announcement that Metro Holdings (SGX: M01) will cease operating its large-format department stores at Paragon and Causeway Point when their leases expire marks the end of an era for Singapore’s traditional retail sector.
Metro announced plans to reposition its retail business as part of a long-term strategy to better meet evolving consumer preferences and strengthen the positioning of its retail business in Singapore.
Following a strategic review of its retail business amidst the operating challenges faced by Singapore’s retail sector, Metro intends to gradually transit away from operating traditional large-format department stores towards a more flexible retail approach that emphasises customer engagement, specialised retail concepts supporting new retail opportunities and greater operational agility.
As such, Metro will cease operating its existing large-format department stores at Metro Paragon and Metro Causeway Point upon the conclusion of the existing lease arrangements. The company is already in discussions with the existing landlords, as well as other landlords, to rollout the new retail multi-concept stores.
Here is a walkthrough of the decline of Singapore’s retail, Metro’s corporate pivot, and where a potential turnaround play possibly lies.
History & The Retail Triumvirate: John Little, Robinsons, & Metro
Singapore’s high street was historically dominated by three legacy retail giants:
- John Little: Singapore’s oldest department store. Famous for family-friendly, value-for-money goods (notably at Specialists’ Shopping Centre and Plaza Singapura). Facing steep e-commerce competition and rising mall rents, owner Robinsons Group shuttered its final store at Plaza Singapura in 2016.
- Robinsons: The flagship upmarket department store on Orchard Road (The Heeren and Raffles City). Ravaged by digital shift, shifting consumer tastes, and razor-thin margins, Robinsons liquidated its Singapore brick-and-mortar operations in late 2020 after 162 years.
- Metro: Founded by Ong Tjoe Kim as a modest 700 sq ft store on High Street. Over decades, Metro expanded into iconic anchor spaces at Far East Plaza, Paragon, and Causeway Point.
What Transpired?
Department stores operated on a master-tenant arbitrage model: lease massive footage, anchor malls, and rely on foot traffic. When e-commerce disrupted pricing and consumer preferences shifted toward boutique/direct-to-consumer experiences, giant multi-story layouts became unprofitable liabilities rather than revenue engines.
Background of Metro: Transformation & Properties
Recognizing early on that traditional retail would hit saturation, Metro aggressively diversified into property investment and development from the late 1980s onward. Today, retail is only a tiny slice of Metro’s balance sheet; it is actually primarily a real estate group that will likely survive past the decline in retail.
Metro’s Real Estate Footprint
- China: Metro City and Metro Tower in Shanghai, GIE Tower in Guangzhou, alongside property developments in Nanchang, Chengdu, and a 20+% associate stake in HK listed developer Top Spring International (HKG:3688).
- Singapore: Grade-A office building Asia Green (Tampines), co-investments in logistics/industrial assets (though it recently divested its 26% stake in Boustead Industrial Fund for $116 million cash in 2026), and residential developments.
- Australia & UK: Co-investments in a $1B+ retail/office portfolio across Australia with Sim Lian Group, and mixed-use/residential developments in Manchester, Sheffield, and London (Fairbriar).

Metro’s Group CEO was actually a property executive with more than 20 years in CapitaLand and Ascott, thus enabling and building Metro’s real estate footprint.
Financial Performance, Valuations, & Cash Position
Metro’s retail closure news comes on the back of massive headwind-driven impairments from its real estate exposure in Mainland China.
5-Year Financial & Share Price Snapshot

- Share Price: Currently trading around S$0.46, which equates to a market cap of approx S$380m. The stock has dropped roughly 40%+ over 5 years, in part due to its fading retail business as well as the Chinese real estate crisis dragging on earnings.
- FY2026 Loss: Reported a net loss after tax of S$203.1 Million for FY2026, largely due to non-cash fair value losses and impairments on Chinese associate real estate assets.
Metro still made a substantial loss even after excluding these non-cash items, as Metro made a mere gross profit of $4m on $97m in revenue, insufficient to cover its General and Administrative (G&A) expenses of $30m and finance costs of $24m.
This resulted in net asset value per share falling from $1.40 to $1.12 or $924 million.
Current Valuation Metrics
The P/E ratio is clearly negative due to its loss making state, even if we exclude the non-cash writedowns.
It is also trading on a poor P/S ratio as the revenue has fallen over the years to just under $100m
The only metric worth looking at is the P/B, trading at approx 0.4x P/B. The balance sheet is also very robust with a net debt position of around $80m or $0.10 per share.
Is There a Turnaround Play?
Yes – but not in Retail.
The narrative that Metro is dying simply because its department stores are closing is a complete misnomer. Retail represents a drag on profitability and management bandwidth. Exiting large anchor stores at Paragon and Causeway Point frees Metro from heavy lease obligations and ongoing operational losses.
While Metro’s balance sheet is currently robust, the recurring income on its property investments currently do not adequately cover its sizeable G&A. Therefore, its balance sheet may gradually erode from its operational expenses and any potential future non-cash writedowns
Where the Turnaround Play Actually Exists:
1. Property Capital Recycling (The Primary Engine)
- China Asset De-risking: The vast majority of Metro’s recent losses are non-cash revaluation write-downs in China. As Chinese real estate stabilizes or as Metro writes down those assets to realistic floor values, the drag on earnings will dissipate.
- Asset Monetization: Metro has proven it can unlock hidden value. Selling its 26% stake in the Boustead Industrial Fund netted S$116 Million in cash. Though it would be much harder to unlock value from some of its China and Hong Kong assets due to the soft market.
- Deployment into High-Yield Developed Markets: Metro is pivoting capital toward income-generating logistics, Student Accommodation (PBSA in the UK), and commercial assets in Australia and Singapore, which generate stable recurring cash flow.
2. Transition to an “Asset-Light” Retail Strategy
- Metro is not killing retail entirely, but pivoting to brand management, pop-ups, curated concept spaces, and multi-specialty boutique stores.
- This removes high fixed overhead costs from its large rent footprints and changes retail from a high-risk capital burner to a flexible, asset-light license model.
The Investment Bottom Line
Metro is essentially a deep-value real estate asset play and not a dying department store.
However, there are plenty of deep-value real estate asset plays without a strong recurring income base. Therefore, Metro’s turnaround hinges on its CEO Yip Hoong Mun who has a real estate background from blue chip names. It will depend on how Metro realises value on its current investments, re-deploy its cash balance into higher-yielding logistics/living assets in the UK/Australia, build recurring income and also completely stop the bleeding from retail operations.
Join our Telegram to stay updated on the latest investing news: https://t.me/realDrWealth




